watch the documentary “One Nation Under Stress” (2020) directed by Marc Levin and answer some questions | Coursehero Helper

Criteria (Points)

Excellent (25-20)

Good (15-19)

Fair (14-8)

Needs Improvement (Below 7)

Comprehensive and accurate content review

The documentary was presented thoroughly, accurately and persuasive manner in the paper.

Some key points either missing or glossed over unnecessarily.

Either some material was not covered or was covered inaccurately or superficially.

Key points were not covered or were covered in a totally inaccurate manner.

Critical analysis and reflection on useful knowledge

Thoughtful, critical analysis of the assigned documentary offered in the paper and details on key issues are provided.

Analysis advanced key ideas but did so sporadically or inconsistently; some details are missing from the analysis.

Analysis included some key ideas but failed to reflect most of them and either the details are not included or inaccurate

The paper largely failed to grasp key issues and lacked any details or critical approach.

Implications drawn, tied to the broader themes of course

Implications explored were realistic and thoughtful. Made insightful connections between assigned material, key theoretical concepts, broader course themes.

Some effort made to identify implications of material, but teasing out their importance to course, theories, and concepts could be better.

Some effort made to identify implications of material, but teasing out their importance to course, theories, and concepts is incomplete.

The paper largely failed to identify key implications and little or no effort made to link findings with broader themes/concepts.

Writing Mechanics

Excellent writing of paper; organization of paper; use of concise, clear language; use of professional language is evident.

Good writing of paper; organization of paper; use of concise, clear language; use of professional language is evident.

Some evidence of good writing of paper; organization of paper; use of concise, clear language; use of professional language is intermittent.

Little if any evidence of good writing of paper; organization of paper; use of concise, clear language; lack of use of professional language.