Capital Punishment and The Death Penalty Discussion No plagiarism please. Use my text, 6th edition. My jurisdiction is Montana. Please hit distinguished in

Capital Punishment and The Death Penalty Discussion No plagiarism please. Use my text, 6th edition. My jurisdiction is Montana. Please hit distinguished in the scoring guide. IntroductionCapital punishment, or the death penalty, can be analyzed from three different perspectives: the legal perspective; the philosophical, oral, and ethical perspective; and the analysis of empirical data on deterrence, public opinion, and so on. The constitutionality of the death penalty under Eighth Amendment continues to be a controversial legal issue. Some members of the court have felt that it is a barbaric punishment that has no place in a civilized society. Others have taken the view that the mention of capital crimes in the Fifth Amendment is sufficient evidence that the imposition of capital punishment is constitutionally permissible under appropriate circumstances.In your main post, respond to the following from a criminal justice practitioner’s perspective, supported by legal reasoning:
Describe the capital crime or crimes in your jurisdiction.
Articulate your position as to whether capital punishment is an appropriate punishment for offenses other than murder.
Explain your perspective as to whether the manner in which capital punishment is imposed is a question of legality, morality, or emotion, considering public opinion.
Explore how the implementation and enforcement of capital punishment could affect the mindset, philosophy, and/or actions of a criminal justice practitioner in carrying out their duties.Criteria
Non-performance
Basic
Proficient
Distinguished

Main Discussion Post Response (60%)

Apply critical thinking or problem solving in the main discussion post.
50%
Does not apply elements of critical thinking or problem solving in the main discussion post.
Applies some elements of critical thinking or problem solving in the main discussion post.
Applies critical thinking or problem solving in the main discussion post.
Applies critical thinking or problem solving to the main discussion post in a comprehensive, step-by-step manner.

Use credible information or research to support positions, conclusions, or perspectives in the discussion.
10%
Does not use credible information or research to support positions, conclusions, or perspectives in the discussion.
Responds to the discussion, but some or all of the resources used for support are not credible.
Uses credible information or research to support positions, conclusions, or perspectives in the discussion.
Uses well- developed, relevant support from credible resources or research to support positions, conclusions, or perspectives in the discussion and impartially considers conflicting data or other perspectives.

Follow-up Post Response One (15%)

Advance the discussion with a substantive response that asks questions, assesses further considerations, or provides a different point of view.
15%
Does not respond to the discussion beyond the initial post.
Provides a substantive response, but does not advance the discussion by asking questions, assessing further considerations, or providing a different point of view.
Advances the discussion with a substantive response that asks questions, assesses further considerations, or provides a different point of view.
Advances the discussion with a substantive response that contains well- supported and fully developed positions and perspectives that support or conflict with the original post.

Follow-up Response Two (15%)

Advance the discussion with a substantive response that asks questions, assesses further considerations, or provides a different point of view.
15%
Does not respond to the discussion beyond the initial post or the first response.
Provides a substantive response, but does not advance the discussion by asking questions, assessing further considerations, or providing a different point of view.
Advances the discussion with a substantive response that asks questions, assesses further considerations, or provides a different point of view.
Advances the discussion with a substantive response that contains well- supported and fully developed positions and perspectives that support or conflict with the original post.

All Posts (10%)

Communicate in a professional manner that is consistent with expectations for criminal justice professionals.
10%
Communicates in a manner that is inconsistent with expectations for criminal justice professionals.
Communicates in a manner that is not fully consistent with expectations for criminal justice professionals.
Communicates in a professional manner that is consistent with expectations for criminal justice professionals.
Communicates in a clear, comprehensive, and professional manner aligned with with expectations for criminal justice professionals.