GEA Business law | Coursehero Helper

Full Marks

The four assignment requirements were met in the submission.

Satisfactory

Some but not all of the four assignment requirements were discussed.

No Marks

Just one of the assignment requirements were discussed or there was no post at all.

Full Marks

Great professional writing style is used in the assignment, citations are appropriate, and the word count is met.

Satisfactory

Good professional writing style with few grammatical errors. Citations are not appropriate or missing.

No Marks

Unprofessional writing style and grammatical errors. No citations.

1.0 ptsSatisfactory: Student satisfactorily demonstrates human and cultural diversity attributes by demonstrating effective and appropriate interaction in a variety of cultural contexts.

0.0 ptsUnsatisfactory: Student does not satisfactorily demonstrate human and cultural diversity attributes.

3.0 ptsProficient: Student demonstrates the ability to construct a clear and insightful problem statement and to identify multiple approaches to solve a problem that indicate insightful comprehension of the problem and carefully addresses multiple contextual factors and thoroughly reviews results relative to the problem with specific consideration of need for further work.

2.0 ptsDeveloping: Student demonstrates the ability to construct a problem statement, proposes multiple solutions that suggest comprehension of the problem, some of which apply within a specific context, and reviews results relative to the problem with some consideration of need for further work.

1.0 ptsNovice: Student demonstrates a limited ability to identify a problem statement and approaches for solving the problem, provides vague and cursory solutions that do not directly address a problem, and reviews results superficially with no consideration of need for further work.

3.0 ptsProficient: Student identifies and states problems clearly and completely in understandable terms, carefully and comprehensively evaluates the relevance of assumptions and questions the viewpoints of experts when presenting a position, and formulates conclusions based on a thorough and logical thought process that reflects careful analysis of appropriate assumptions and evidence.

2.0 ptsDeveloping: Student identifies problems to be considered critically with some omissions or lack of clarity, gathers mostly appropriate information to develop coherent arguments, and questions some conventional assumptions and often considers opposing viewpoints when formulating conclusions.

1.0 ptsNovice: Student demonstrates some awareness of assumptions when identifying positions, states problems in simple terms without much clarification, generally accepts viewpoints of experts as fact without question, and routinely reaches conclusions not consistently tied to some of the available information.

3.0 ptsProficient: Student demonstrates a thorough understanding of required context and is able to create a skillfully developed presentation that provides relevant, detailed, and compelling assertions supported by credible and relevant sources.

2.0 ptsDeveloping: Student demonstrates an adequate understanding of required context and is able to explore ideas that are fairly-well developed in a presentation that is mostly organized and includes basic use of relevant sources to support ideas.

1.0 ptsNovice: Student is able to develop simple ideas in portions of the assignment, provides a basic, somewhat organized presentation, and attempts to use sources to support ideas with some attention to context.