HST300 Civil Rights Portfolio Project For the Portfolio Project, write a paper about a historical event that you or someone you know experienced from 1945

HST300 Civil Rights Portfolio Project For the Portfolio Project, write a paper about a historical event that you or someone you know experienced from 1945 to the present.

It is imperative to research the event and place it into proper historical perspective.

For example, a person may have been raised during the 1960s civil rights demonstrations in Birmingham, Alabama. Do not tell only the personal story but also examine and explain the events of the civil rights movement that influenced the personal story. In other words, the paper must not only tell the person’s story but also represent the historical significance of the time and events.

Other examples may be:

Explain the impact of the Reagan years.
Summarize the significance of the first observance of Martin Luther King Day, January 20, 1986.
Relate Mikhail Gorbachev’s ideas of perestroika and glasnost to the fall of communism.
Describe the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait on August 2, 1990, resulting in UN Resolution #678.
Evaluate the administration of President Bill Clinton.
Relate the significance of the Oklahoma City bombing of April 19, 1995.
Explain the growth of Islamic terrorism at home and abroad in Africa, the Middle East, and Southeast Asia.
Summarize the effects of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2002.
Tell how Hurricane Katrina, which formed on August 23, 2005, affected the U.S. and your personal life or the life of someone you know.
Describe the significance of the presidential election of November 4, 2008, of Barack Obama

This paper must include a discussion of the following topics:

A thorough summary of the personal story, including the incidents that took place and the key individuals involved.
The importance of the event in the larger scope of U.S. history. Explain the historical situation of the event.
How the event changed the daily life of the person from whose perspective you are writing.
The lasting legacy of the event in the U.S. and the world.

Your final deliverable should be 6-8 pages in length (excluding cover page and references) and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site.. Be sure to discuss and reference concepts taken from the assigned textbook reading and relevant research. Review the grading rubric to see how you will be graded for this assignment.

Be sure to discuss and reference concepts taken from the assigned textbook reading and relevant research. You must include a minimum of five resources, including

At least one primary resource (textbook or required reading)
At least one scholarly journal
Secondary resources (credible, academic, or professional references beyond the text or required course readings).

Remember, a strong paper must contain the following:

A clearly defined introduction, body with at least two main ideas, and a conclusion
Examples supporting your thesis
A forceful conclusion reiterating your main ideas 3/23/2019
Module 8: Portfolio Project
HST300 Mod 8 PP
https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/7939/assignments/150408?module_item_id=375623
1/6
3/23/2019
Module 8: Portfolio Project
Criteria
Introduction &
Conclusion
Research and
Perspective
Ratings
35.0 to >28.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides strong or
adequate thought,
insight, and analysis
through a clearly
defined introduction
and conclusion.
40.0 to >32.0 pts
Meets
Expectation
Provides strong or
adequate thought,
insight, and
analysis through
independent
research. Offers
an appropriate
first­person and
historical
perspective of the
event.
28.0 to >20.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant but
not major errors or
omissions in thought,
insight, and analysis in
the introduction and
conclusion.
32.0 to >24.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant but
not major errors or
omissions in thought,
insight, and analysis
through independent
research. Offers a
somewhat appropriate
first­person and
historical perspective of
the event.
https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/7939/assignments/150408?module_item_id=375623
Pts
20.0 to >13.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Major errors or
omissions in
thought, insight,
and analysis in
the introduction
and conclusion.
24.0 to >16.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major errors or
omissions in
thought, insight,
and analysis
through
independent
research. Offers a
flawed or
incomplete first­
person and
historical
perspective of the
event.
13.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Fails to
demonstrate
thought, insight,
and analysis in
the introduction
and conclusion.
16.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to
demonstrate
thought, insight,
and analysis
through
independent
research. Does not
offer an
appropriate first­
person and
historical
perspective of the
event.
35.0 pts
40.0 pts
2/6
3/23/2019
Module 8: Portfolio Project
Criteria
Critical
Thinking &
Analysis
Evaluation of
the
Significance
of the Event
Ratings
Pts
40.0 to >32.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates
strong or adequate
synthesis and
evaluation of the
person’s story and
the examination of
the events of the
historical situation
that influenced the
personal story.
32.0 to >24.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant but
not major errors or
omissions in synthesis
and evaluation of the
person’s story and the
examination of the
events of the historical
situation that
influenced the
personal story.
24.0 to >16.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Major errors or
omissions in
synthesis and
evaluation of the
person’s story and
the examination of
the events of the
historical situation
that influenced the
personal story.
16.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to
demonstrate
synthesis and
evaluation of the
person’s story and
the examination of
the events of the
historical situation
that influenced the
personal story.
40.0 to >32.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Provides strong or
adequate thought,
insight, and
analysis regarding
the importance of
the event in the
larger scope of
U.S. history.
32.0 to >24.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant but
not major errors or
omissions in thought,
insight, and analysis
regarding the
importance of the event
in the larger scope of
U.S. history.
24.0 to >16.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Major errors or
omissions in
thought, insight,
and analysis
regarding the
importance of the
event in the larger
scope of U.S.
history.
16.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to
demonstrate
thought, insight,
and analysis
regarding the
importance of the
event in the larger
scope of U.S.
history.
https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/7939/assignments/150408?module_item_id=375623
40.0 pts
40.0 pts
3/6
3/23/2019
Module 8: Portfolio Project
Criteria
Analysis of
the Event’s
Impact and
Legacy
Application of
Source
Material
Ratings
40.0 to >32.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Demonstrates strong
or adequate thought
and insight regarding
how the event
changed the daily life
of the person in the
story and the lasting
legacy of the event in
the US and the world.
32.0 to >24.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant but
not major errors or
omissions regarding
how the event
changed the daily life
of the person in the
story and the lasting
legacy of the event in
the US and the world.
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Sources well or adequately chosen
to provide substance and
perspectives on the issue?
knowledge from the course linked
properly to source material.
24.0 to >16.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Major errors or
omissions
regarding how the
event changed the
daily life of the
person in the story
and the lasting
legacy of the
event in the US
and the world.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Some significant
but not major
problems with
selection and
linkage of
sources.
https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/7939/assignments/150408?module_item_id=375623
Pts
16.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Fails to include
relevant content
related to how the
event changed the
daily life of the
person in the story
and the lasting
legacy of the event
in the US and the
world.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Major problems
with selection
and linkage of
sources.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Source
selection is
seriously
flawed? no
linkage to
knowledge
from the
course.
40.0 pts
20.0 pts
4/6
3/23/2019
Module 8: Portfolio Project
Criteria
Organization
Grammar and
Style
Demonstrates
proper use of
APA style
Ratings
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project is clearly
organized, well
written, and in proper
format including an
introduction, body,
and conclusion.
Conforms to project
requirements.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Small number of
significant but not
major flaws in
organization and
writing. In a minor
way does not
conform to project
requirements.
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Strong sentence and
paragraph structure? few
or no minor errors in
grammar and spelling?
appropriate writing style?
clear and concise with no
unsupported comments.
20.0 to >16.0 pts
Meets Expectation
Project contains
proper APA
formatting, according
to the CSU­Global
Guide to Writing &
APA, with no more
than one significant
error.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Small number of
significant but not
major errors in
grammar and
spelling?
generally
appropriate
writing.
16.0 to >12.0 pts
Approaches
Expectation
Few errors in APA
formatting, according
to the CSU­Global
Guide to Writing &
APA, with no more
than two to three
significant errors.
https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/7939/assignments/150408?module_item_id=375623
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Major problems in
organization and
writing? does not
completely follow
proper format. In a
significant way does
not conform to project
requirements.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below Expectation
Inconsistent to
inadequate sentence
and paragraph
development? work
needed on grammar
and spelling? does
not meet program
expectations.
12.0 to >8.0 pts
Below
Expectation
Significant errors in
APA formatting,
according to the
CSU­Global Guide
to Writing & APA,
with four to five
significant errors.
Pts
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Project is not
well organized or
well written and
is not in proper
format. Does not
conform to
project
requirements.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited
Evidence
Poor quality?
unacceptable in
terms of
grammar and/or
spelling?
inappropriate
writing style that
interferes with
clarity.
8.0 to >0 pts
Limited Evidence
Numerous errors in
APA formatting,
according to the
CSU­Global Guide
to Writing & APA,
with more than five
significant errors.
20.0 pts
20.0 pts
20.0 pts
5/6
3/23/2019
Criteria
Module 8: Portfolio Project
Ratings
Pts
Total Points: 275.0
https://csuglobal.instructure.com/courses/7939/assignments/150408?module_item_id=375623
6/6

Purchase answer to see full
attachment