Ethics in a Professional Environment This project consists of an essay question with multiple components, all of which must be addressed in some form. In

Ethics in a Professional Environment This project consists of an essay question with multiple components, all of which must be addressed in some form.

In this essay, in 800 words, you should answer:

– Why are ethics important when conducting oneself in a professional environment?

– Describe how you developed your professional set of ethics.

– Describe the process you may use to recognize ethical dilemmas. I recommend relating this to your job, or to your desired occupation, and providing at least one example of an ethical dilemma you may face.

– In a professional environment, what are the consequences, immediate or far-reaching, of unethical behavior? Who are potential stakeholders impacted by ethical/unethical behavior in a professional context?

You will need to use outside sources as support in your document and they must be cited within the document. I do NOT have a preference for the format of your citations (APA vs. MLA vs. Chicago-style). I recommend citing the author’s last name and year of publication, with page numbers included for direct quotations; your citation can look like this: (last name, year). If you have a thought that is not your own, you must give credit to the original source. I will run all essays through a software that checks for plagiarism; this is a form of cheating! Further, you must work on this on your own. Violations of these rules will fail to receive credit on for the essay.

When I grade the essay, I’m looking to see that careful thought and consideration went into your response. This should be a personal essay that relates to you and your unique experience. 1 T-Mobile
© 28%
12:50 AM
A blackboard.sc.edu
Courses
Course Assignments
Excellent
Average
Weak
High
Low
High
Low
5
4
3
2
1
Quality of Thought
Unified and strong
Prompts are answered
thoroughly
Little evidence of
control of ideas. Ideas
Recognition of
complex ideas
control of content.
Opinions and claims are
well-supported. Ample
evidence. Logic is
maintained. Paper is
ambitious and insightful.
Generally unified. Ideas
are balanced. Opinions
and claims are
adequately supported
and usually logical.
Paper is ambitious but
quality is inconsistent
are not supported, or
support is cliched or
illogical. Paper is not
ambitious or insightful.
Credible and logical
support for claims
Clarity of Purpose
Clear purpose
Positions are insightful
and clear. Essay is
focused; intent is
obvious. Clear sense of
Positions are sound and
understandable. Essay is
general; intent is evident.
Somewhat aware of
Lacks position on
topics. Thesis may be
absent or intent is
unclear. Superficial.
Little to no recognition
of audience.
Audience awareness
audience.
audience.
Organization of
Content
Overall unity and
coherence are flawed.
Some evidence of
Arrangement
Parts are poorly
Ideas are well
connected trough
structural and linguistic
transitions. Structure
complements and
completes content.
structural and liguistic
transitions. Structure is
Unity
generally adequate for
the content
connected, and there is
little evidence of
planning or
organization.
Coherence
Language and
Style/Voice
Vocabulary
Exhibits confident,
skillful use of language.
Uses a varied, accurate,
and appropriate
vocabulary. Sentences
are purposefully
designed and matched
to content.
Exhibits adequate but
inconsistent facility in the
use of language. Uses
generally appropriate
vocabulary and varied
Displays little facility in
the use of language.
Uses limited
vocabulary or
inappropriate word
choice. Sentences are
basic. Paper may be
repetitive or wordy.
Register
Tone
sentences.
Mechanics
Grammatical structures
Grammatical structures
Grammar errors are so
Grammar and usage
obtrusive that readers
are well-chosen. No
errors detract from
Punctuation
carry the meaning
forward, although
readers notice
occasional error(s).
are seriously distracted
by them.
meaning.
Spelling
Information Literacy
Quality of sources
Sources are of
Evaluation of sources
Sources are of low
quality or are not
credible or appropriate.
Little to no use of
Integration of sources
Sources are of high
quality, credible, and
appropriate. Source
materials are evaluated
critically, synthesized
thoughtfully, integrated
smoothly, and used
effectively and ethically.
Sources are clearly
identified and
source material in text.
Documentation of
reasonable quality and
are usually credible and
appropriate. Some
attempt at evaluating,
synthesizing, integrating,
and using source
material effectively and
ethically
sources
Possible plagiarism or
unethical treatment of
material due to lack of
information literacy.
introduced correctly.

Purchase answer to see full
attachment